Before the email below was sent to PEW, I looked at DW and told her what I expected the response to be. Sadly, I was correct almost to the letter and it makes me sick.
S1 has, on occasion, been a disciplinary problem at school. He sometimes will lack the self-control to appropriately handle escalating situations which has invariably resulted in physical confrontations. The Psycho Ex-Wife’s almost complete inability to discipline the children has led to instilling them with a complete lack of self-discipline, self-awareness, respect for others, and responsibility for their actions while in her care. I hold the children accountable for their actions and a situation like this rarely occurs during my custody period.
When I was relegated to non-custodial parent status, during the school year I was on the every other weekend basic schedule. I did get extra time during breaks, holidays, summer, etc. When these issues came up at school, PEW’s brand of discipline was picking up the phone and calling me to do it over the phone. Often, when asked for suggestions on punishment, I would make suggestions which would then be ignored. Very often, S1 didn’t get punished at all by PEW and I just wasn’t going to be phone-disciplinarian and be set up like so many fathers before me as “the bad guy who was solely responsible for meting out discipline.”
I can remember one year, not sure if it was last year or the year before, S1 had been involved in 6 or 7 physical confrontations (1-way or 2-way) in the first 4-months of the school year. It wasn’t going to get better and so I intervened. The normal level of discipline for these non-injury physical altercations at school was recess suspension. You lost recess for one day. I had a sit-down with S1 where I explained my near-zero-tolerance policy which would punish any physical altercation except those where there was clear and convincing evidence that he had no choice but to defend himself. I knew the risk associated with that definition would be attempts to make any confrontation one of self-defense, but I simply didn’t want to put him in a position to get bullied by others, either. By the way, I should add that S1’s size makes him look years beyond his actual age of 9 and probably the biggest child in his age group by a good measure. As I felt that a single day’s recess was ineffective at deterring his behavior, I told S1 that from here on out, I was instructing the teachers that the number of recesses that will be suspended for each ensuing altercation would match the number of altercations he’s had for the year. Plus, there would also be discipline on the home front. That would mean since we had 6 altercations already at the time, the next one would result in 7-days of recess suspension. The one after that would result in 8-days recess suspension. And so on. Well, his reaction was shock and disbelief and crying – so I knew I had chosen a good one. PEW, when she heard of my plan from S1, promptly called me and freaked out that I was unfair and run a “boot camp” and so on. Ask me how many more physical confrontations S1 was involved in that year? If you guessed ZERO, you would be correct.
During this past summer, when I had full custody – I don’t recall there being any physical confrontations at summer camp. Since the entire custody arrangement has since changed to 50/50 year-round – until yesterday – there had been no physical confrontations at school.
Tuesday, during a non-sensical escalation with a peer over a shamrock ring which belongs to S1, he was pushed or punched in the chest. The description he gave me was that while attempting to deflect blows and retreat, he hit the other kid in the face. My conclusion given the other details was that he failed to recognize things were escalating and didn’t do a good enough job to avoid it getting physical and would therefore be punished. No yelling. No screaming. No finger wagging. Just a short sit-down discussion about what happened and what the consequences would be.
They would be stiff (for a 9-year old). In this day-and-age, things going on at school will often be dealt with by imposing unusually harsh punishments and my child will not grow up to be a bully like his mother and his Aunt PP if I have anything to do with it. I wonder if the children’s experiences in seeing how their mother and aunt deal with situations has any bearing on their responses and reactions? Coincidence? I think not.
So, given that this is a situation that, according to my boundaries, is a matter of enough significance to warrant keeping PEW informed, I relucantly send an email last night which confirms the Easter weekend details (unrelated) and informs her of this situation. Now I know you won’t be shocked by the reply, but I still want to make mention that this is the person who you see and will continue to see pontificate about “co-parenting” about which I allegedly have “no clue.”
PEW,
For Easter weekend, I will pick them up on Monday morning. Please let me know what time is appropriate.
Today, when I picked up S1 from aftercare, I was informed that there was an “incident” where S1 was involved in a physical altercation with another boy. No one was hurt. S1 was apparently pushed, punched, and/or poked… S1 hit the other boy in the face. All were apparently inconsequential blows.
However, I’ve been very clear with S1 that there is a zero-tolerance policy regarding physical confrontations at school.
His punishment is a loss of snack for tonight and he will not be attending the scout hike this weekend. If the scout hike is postponed, it will remain the punishment for the rescheduled date. It is my hope that if it happens to be rescheduled during your custody time, you will honor the punishment.
~LM
Readers, feel free to give me some honest feedback. I believe that this is a more than appropriate consequence for the action in question. The email is straightforward, clear, and looks for support and buy-in from PEW. S1 values his time and activities at Cub Scouts greatly. This weekend was a family hike with some specific activities (which can be made up later, I already contacted the Leader) – and now we aren’t going. Obviously, fighting with others at school violates the basic tenets of Cub Scouts. S1 was upset, but I explained to him that the punishment needs to be memorable enough for him to really make him think twice before engaging in any fights at school – and that the discipline will only be greater if these actions continue. I could tell he was holding back tears, but it was also clear he understood and even said so, if only to satisfy my desire to see him accept responsibility.
Here is PEW’s buy-in:
LM,
Why didn’t you have S1 tell me about this on the phone last night? I AM PISSED that you took away the hike of all things. What exactly is he learning by missing a cub scout hike? I think you did that for yourself not him. Cub scouts is a “learning” activity AND the hike an opportunity for physical exersize. Maybe if they HAD anything at your house that they actually enjoy, you WOULD have something worth taking away. You are totally determined to screw these boys up aren’t you? Just when I start thinking you might be “OK” you do something like this. It’s just never going to be over is it?
I’ll be calling aftercare today to find out what happened. And I’ll be calling to talk to S1 tonight because I want to hear it from him NOT YOU.
As for S2, why did you send him to school when he’s obviously still sick? Are you going to take him to the Doctor?
As for Easter Monday, I’ll meet you in the parking lot my work at 8:30.
~PEW
Now, we all know why I didn’t discuss it with her on the phone. Further, if she was interested in more than placating his obsession with professional wrestling, which was most of their discussion from what I could hear as I was taking care of cleaning up after dinner, she might have seen fit to ask him about his school day. She didn’t. Certainly S1 was unlikely to volunteer that information of his own accord. I contacted her appropriately and did so via email after the children were in bed. I even avoiding suggesting that his reactions to adverse situations may actually be influenced by professional wrestling. He spends so much time watching it and admiring these guys. Look at how they respond to situations. Look at how he reacts. Coincidence? I think not.
You’ll notice that she also brings something into the discussion which has no place on the topic covered, something that has been and will be an eternal struggle when discussing anything with PEW. Obviously still sick? Other than a runny nose, he was fine and looked forward to going back to school. Further, how did she come to this conclusion over the phone? Dr. PEW has truly missed her calling with her innate ability to diagnose illnesses from afar.
I didn’t respond to her latest angry diatribe. This is just another reason why co-parenting is impossible with a spouse who has a personality disorder of this seriousness. Her obsession with fighting me at every turn on any subject precludes any meaningful co-parenting. It is why I primarily practice parallel parenting. PEW is just completely incapable of seeing any situation more deeply than deflecting blame, keeping the children happy and fond of her no matter the cost, and finding any excuse to escalate a situation that doesn’t meet her warped sense of what is fair, real, or appropriate.
In keeping with open communication with teachers, I sent S1’s teacher the following warning yesterday morning:
Mrs. S1Teacher,
S1 had an incident at aftercare yesterday. Needless to say, he is unhappy with the consequences for his actions and is in a bit of a sour mood this morning.
I told him that he needs to “shake it off” and be able to concentrate on his work today.
I wanted to “tip you off” in the event there is any problems – you’ll know why. Don’t hesitate to let me know if he is/was unable to set it aside in order to concentrate on school work or participation today.
Sincerely,
LM
Shortly thereafter, I got a reply.
Hi Mr. LM,
S1 actually already came to me to tell me what happened. I explained to him that whatever his consequences are is your decision. I mentioned to him that same as you that he needs to concentrate on his work today and deal with the decisions that were made. I will let you know how he makes out today.
Thanks for the heads up!
Mrs. S1Teacher
Both the boys’ teachers are pretty great, especially this one. I’m certain that S1 is looking for sympathy from anyone for his plight. Eventually, he’ll get that from PEW and the mixed messages that he is getting from both of his parents will continue to cross him up. She’ll put on that sickening “whiny voice” and tell him that none of this is his fault, dad is a big meanie, and probably promise to buy him several toys in order to place herself high upon the pedestal in her sons’ eyes. It will completely undermine me and do absolutely no good for S1.
Carrying on with the latest email barrage after my no-futher-contact position, I get this:
LM,
I am not done with you about this hike thing. S1 needs the hike toward earning his Bear Badge…..everyone else will be earning it and get it at the same time and you are punishing S1 because you don’t feel like hiking Saturday, so he’ll be the only kid in his Den NOT getting his badge and widdling chip. That is not an appropriate consequence or punishment for what happened at aftercare. Think of something else.
~PEW
This, too, will not receive a reply.
As I’ve already mentioned, this is not the case. I’ve contacted the Den Leader to ensure that his earning his badge is not at risk nor his ability to attain his whittling chip. I did so without informing him of why he will not be in attendance. I simply told him “something has come up” and he may not be in attendance in order to find out if these items were in jeopardy. Truth be told, if it was the case, I’d have chosen some other significant event to use as there are several coming up. I can use this Saturday to continue to teach him how his behavior has consequences (good and bad). We can go on a family hike and I can teach him appropriate pocket-knife handling, storage, and usage.
Notice her ongoing disconnect between S1’s behavior and how it violates the basic rules & laws of the pack. She just doesn’t get it. She never has. She never will. To her, getting the chip & badge is of paramount importance, no matter whose ass S1 has to kick to get them. I didn’t ask and don’t know, but I’m sure if the den leader found out he was involved in a “fight” at school, his ability to attain these rewards might be in jeopardy whether he went on the hike or not.
Notice that she continues to be completely incapable of even suggesting what she thinks is appropriate disciplinary action. It’s always someone else’s responsibility. “Think of something else.” “I’m not done with you.”
Guess what, PEW? You are done with me you because I said so. Unless you come and kidnap the children during my custody time and manage to elude the authorities long enough to take him hiking yourself (which she won’t do) – this will be the consequence for his action.
In closing out this post, when I picked up S1 from after-school care, he was in a much better place. He was excitedly telling me about how he made the right decision today. Long-story short, he was faced with another potential physical confrontation on recess. When a “friend” of his desired to have S1 put him in a wrestling move, S1 told him, “Sorry, I don’t want to get into any physical confrontations.” The kid asked him if he was a wimp before shoving him into a bike rack unexpectedly. He actually has a nice big bruise on his hip. He didn’t strike back. He removed himself from the situation even amid apparent chants to “FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT” from a gathering crowd. Some witnesses had already moved to report the incident to a teacher and guess who was sent down to the principal’s office? Not S1! (Story confirmed.) It all went down just like I told him it would. He was very pleased with himself.
On the walk to the van and the ride home, I repeatedly told him how proud I was of his handling of the situation today. He even said, “Yeah, I was kind of hoping this would mean I could go on the hike this weekend!”
Me: “No, that won’t be what it means, but S1, I’m still really proud of the way you handled the situation today, really I am.”
S1: “Darn. Okay.”
We carried on our discussion a little further and I told him, “S1, one thing you aren’t is a wimp. You know you’re much bigger than anyone else in your class. The fact is, you could very likely throttle the snot out of anybody who might challenge you. Just because of that, you will be challenged. Avoid it if you can.” I went on to explain that the low tolerance of schools nowadays results in kids being kicked out of school for all kinds of seemingly silly reasons. If that was to happen to him, we would all have a lot bigger problems to deal with in terms of finding a place for him to go to school… and so on. I reiterated the “no choice self-defense” exception while clearly explaining what that entails.
Here’s hoping a few things:
1 – He remembers the punishment that has been handed down as a deterrent to future problems with physical confrontations at school.
2 – He remembers how things went down today when he didn’t retaliate. Him – no trouble. The other kid – trouble. Dad – proud and praising.
3 – PEW doesn’t undermine the lessons that seem to be being learned and understood this week.
I expected more PEW harassment by the time bedtime was reached last night, but it didn’t materialize. I can only imagine what “I’m not done with you yet on this” means. Here’s hoping it’s not an emergency hearing to have the judge allow S1 to go on that hike Saturday.
Don’t laugh.